Term
Restructuring plan
A document setting out how creditors' rights and the debtor's obligations will change so the debtor can keep trading, for example through partial debt write-offs or instalments. Creditor classes vote on it and the court confirms it.
Updated
What it means
A restructuring plan is a document setting out how creditors' rights and the debtor's obligations will change so the debtor can keep trading. It may include partial debt write-offs, instalment schedules, debt-to-equity swaps, the sale of part of the assets or changes to operations.
It is at the heart of both restructuring and preventive restructuring. Creditors vote on the plan in classes according to the type of claim, such as secured, unsecured or employees, and the court confirms it if the statutory conditions are met.
The plan must offer creditors at least what they would receive in bankruptcy. This best-interests test protects dissenting creditors from being forced by the majority into a worse outcome than liquidation would bring.
How it works in practice
Preparing a plan starts with a thorough analysis: why the company got into trouble, what its real assets and liabilities are, and whether the business can become profitable once its debts are adjusted. Without a realistic business plan, creditors will not accept the plan and the court will not confirm it.
Negotiating with the largest creditors, especially banks and the state, is key. Their stance often decides the vote. The plan should be clear to them and show why keeping the company going will yield more than winding it up.
Once confirmed by the court, the plan binds even creditors who voted against it. The company must then meet its terms, such as instalments; if it fails to do so, creditors may seek reinstatement of their original claims or file for bankruptcy.
What to watch out for
Restructuring is not a way to shed debt without sacrifice. The plan must be fair to creditors, and owners often have to contribute, for example with new money or by giving up part of their stake. Attempts to favour related parties will be rejected by both court and creditors.
Timing is decisive. The longer a company waits, the less value and trust remain. A director who does not act in time when insolvency looms risks personal liability, and the company may lose the chance to restructure and end up in bankruptcy instead.
Need the term explained on your own situation? Consulting from €55 / hour excl. VAT, depending on topic and complexity.